Showing posts with label GMO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GMO. Show all posts

Sunday, July 10, 2016

Toilet Paper - Why We Should be Going Organic

Toilet Paper is something we use every day but not enough thought goes into it. Some people just buy whatever is on sale or what feels soft. Some of us are concerned about recycling things and we use recycled toilet paper. Others of us, want organic tissue but can't seem to find it on the market. (Some people reuse their wipes, and I included a link for that. It is not what you think and yes it would take some getting use to for most of us.) What is the skinny on toilet paper after all?

I would like to start by saying that any product that has cotton in it may also have glyphosate (RoundUp) or Bacillus thuringensis in it, if not organic. Much of the cotton on the market is from RoundUp Ready or BT cotton.  This includes your toilet paper if it contains cotton. Some toilet papers do have cotton in them. Many do not have cotton in them and are made from trees or recycled paper.  

Consider that  our forests both natural forests and our monocrop forests have insecticides and herbicides used on them. Additionally, when there are fires, horrendous chemicals are used to put the fires out. All of this can get into our toilet paper.  Most of us know of the issue of herbicides and pesticides in tampons, sanitary napkins, diapers and clothing. We have complained and organic alternatives were created. Why have we not clamored for organic toilet paper? 

Hemp paper is a choice. It can be grown organic,  and I have read it can be processed without chemicals and be rather soft. According to the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture one acre of hemp can produce 4 times more paper than one acre of trees.  There is hemp TP on the market. What about organic hemp TP?

What about recycled toilet paper? Many of us use it. Toilet paper uses more than 8 million tons of  trees to make the toilet paper each year in the United States. All toilet paper is usually bleached during the process. Both the TP made from fresh, new trees or from recycled paper contains chlorine unless you purchase TP that goes through a non-chlorine process. Additionally recycled toilet paper has  Bisphenol A (BPA) and or Bisphenol S (BPS) in it. It appears to be coming from thermal paper which is coated with BPA(S). Thermal paper reduces fading and is found in business receipts, some newspapers (ink), magazines, flyers etc. When these various papers get recycled, the BPA(S) can get recycled along with it. When it gets into your toilet paper, this means you are wiping yourself with paper that has an endocrine disrupter in it. You are rubbing it on your sensitive skin multiple times per day.

 You might say, organic toilet paper is the only way to go. However, I can't find any available and it is why I am writing this article. I would like to give you a link for organic toilet paper but I don’t know of any. You can buy organic tampons, sanitary napkins and diapers but no toilet paper that I know of. If you know of organic toilet paper, please let me know. 

So what is a person to do? Well there are bidets.  They are not used so much in our country but becoming more popular. This is understandable since toilet paper is so toxic.  I have seen them for sale at Home Depot. There are attachments you can buy for your toilet to turn it into a bidet. People seem to like this one on Amazon. 

Using reusable cloth toilet paper is another alternative. Yes, you read correctly. Before you get entirely creeped out, I suggest you read this article.  I found it quite interesting.
  
By the way, some companies selling toilet paper such as Paseo toilet paper are being boycotted as they are cutting down forests that are needed for some of the last remaining tigers, elephants and other endangered species. (There is so much more to know about toilet paper than just picking it up off the shelf.)

Please do let me know if you  find organic toilet paper. Perhaps it is out there. 

Friday, July 8, 2016

Congressional Hearing on Glyphosate

There was a congressional hearing on glyphosate on June 14th, 2016. The EPA (environmental protection agency) and the CARC (Cancer Assessment Review Committee) claim glyphosate is "Not Likely to be Carcinogenic to Humans). However, IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) claims it is likely to  be carcinogenic to humans. The data would support IARC. 

At a recent congressional hearing the data seemed to speak loud and clear that glyphosate is associated with a number of health conditions and needs to be better studied. The studies that exist also need to be better paid attention to.  

The people who testified at that hearing have their testimony available at this link. I suggest you take a look at it. You will learn what it is used on, how much is used in our country. You will also learn what hazards are associated with it, and which diseases have risen in conjunction with increased use of glyphosate on our food supply. If this is a bit  much for you to go through and you would rather listen to a lecture, I suggest going to you tube and listening to one or two of Stephanie Seneff's lectures. She is one of the presenters at the congressional hearing. Her web page also has a long list of her papers she has written and presentations of which many are on glyphosate. You will find them here.


Increased Consumption of Subsidized Food is Associated With Diabetes, Obesity and Cardiovascular Risk

New research shows an association between higher consumption of foods derived from subsidized commodities with adverse heart and metabolic risks. Specifically, it shows an increase in C-reactive protein which measures inflammation,  increased blood sugar levels, increased cholesterol levels and increased waist measurement. So, basically this tells us that consumption of subsidized foods in the United States is associated with inflammation, and increased parameters that may lead to obesity, heart disease, and diabetes as well as other disease states associated with inflammation and dysglycemia. 

So what is on that list of foods that are subsidized. Well soybeans and corn are right up there at the top of that list. We know that GMO corn and soy dominate the market with very little of it being conventional or even organic. So they are the main subsidized crop people are eating. If you have paid any attention to the data collected on RoundUp Ready soy and GMO corn you will not be surprised at this research.

The researchers suggested subsidies be shifted towards healthier crops such as fruit and vegetables. Something, many of us have been requesting for some time. The fact that research now is available to support our point of view will help this shift to actually take place.

The original research can be accessed here.

Tuesday, September 29, 2015

GMO Death Fields

Forrest Pritchard, a farmer who grew GMO's in the past, recently said, "In order for those crops to grow, it requires death on a massive scale." He was pointing out that many of the GMO crops are genetically modified to resist herbicides that would usually kill the plants. This means these herbicides are now sprayed continuously on the food you eat and the land. They are sprayed over and over and over again. He says, "You can see it from outer space. According to the USDA, this year in America alone, more than 170 million acres of corn and soybeans are in production. At a conservative estimate of 10 gallons of glyphosate (the herbicide most commonly used in conjunction with GMO crops) per acre in dilution, this translates to roughly two billion gallons of herbicide poured onto American soils this year alone. "  Read Forrest's whole article here and see the photos of dead fields awaiting planting of GMOs.

The soil on our planet can be likened to the gut of a human being. Forrest Pritchard mentions that glyphosate ends up killing off all the plants on the property except for the ones resistant to the herbicide, but you should also know it kills off the natural soil bacterial biome. Just like our gut needs bacteria for us to be healthy, the soil also needs bacteria to be healthy. According to Don Huber, a world renowned soil scientist, glyphosate (RoundUp is one of the brand name's for glyphosate and the most commonly used herbicide sprayed on GMOs.) kills off good bacteria but seems to allow some of the pathogenic bacteria to live and thrive. Do we want to destroy the digestive capacity of our planet? This is what we support every time we purchase a GMO vegetable or eat meat raised with GMOs. 

Regarding your own digestion, you might find it interesting to know that Don Huber also says glyphosate chelates minerals so they are no longer as biologically available to us when we eat the food. Therefore, when you eat food that is a GMO it will provide less minerals that are actually biologically available as they are tied up and not available for digestion. Our gut bugs also appear to be harmed by glyphosate, so GMOs are bad news for our digestion too. Additionally the GMOs that are modified to produce the insecticide called Bacillus thuringiensis also appear to alter our gut biome and possibly cause intestinal inflammation.

The GMO farmers are now able to spray much more weed killer than before. They are able to spray it to kill the weeds prior to planting and spray the whole time the plant is growing to keep the weeds killed off. Prior to the GMO era they were not able to spray glyphosate when the crop was in the ground. Now they can spray glyphosate all the year around and this is why we now have so much more glyphosate being sprayed in the USA than previously.

Realize that we now  have soy and corn resistant to the agent orange derived 2,4-D herbicide. More fall-out awaits us in the future unless we refuse to purchase these vegetables and meat grown with GMOs. You and I have the ability to stop it in its tracks by deciding what we purchase. Just purchase organic and you are voting with your dollars to end planetary destruction.

I wrote up some pertinent details on a long glyphosate review that covered 286 research articles on the hazards of glyphosate written by Stephanie Seneff and Anthony Samsel in 2013. You can find it here.

I plan to read a more recent review of glyphosate and if it is interesting and you would like to know more (tell me below), I will write up pertinent points about that review in a coming blog for you all to read.

Please forward this to your family and friends. Please share with them why you do not eat GMOs. Purchase the book Seeds of Deception by Jeffrey Smith and give it to them. I am providing both a book or DVD link for the book below. The book is quite a bit less expensive.






Tuesday, December 2, 2014

Glyphosate (RoundUp), The Cause of Autism, Inflammatory Gut Diseases and More

I published a review on the wonderful research article on glyphosate (RoundUp)  in 2013. If you did not read that review, you can find it here. You know how much I hate glyphosate and the fact that conventional food is swimming in it, so when I saw one of the research writers of this article had a YouTube video on glyphosate, I thought I should share it with you. It just happens to be Stephanie Sennef who's cholesterol and statin data I published yesterday. Additionally, Don Huber gives a lecture on the bottom. He is an amazing soil scientist and you will have your jaw drop when you listen to what he has to say. 

By the way, one of my readers advised me to remind you all to do your Amazon.com Holiday shopping via the link on the right side of my page which helps to financially support this blog. They told me they forget to go through the link and needed a reminder themselves.

Here is a 2013 lecture Stephanie gave in August.

This interview on Glyphosate and Autism she gave in 2014  in August and she looks at Glyphosate and Aluminum in relation to Autism

This is a Jeffrey Smith Interview of Stephanie on Roundup.
I also suggest you listen to the soil scientist Don Huber here.

Friday, August 23, 2013

Monsanto's Stock Taking A Dive

Yipee, finally the news is getting out to Monsanto's stockholders that the world does not trust Monsanto and does not want their food. It is finally effecting their stocks. You can read more about it HERE.

It shows us that our constant persistence can pay off! Keep educating everyone and keep telling your stores you want non-GMO choices. The more people that refuse to buy their so called food, the less money Monsanto has and eventually they change or collapse. They already see the writing on the wall. I know a farmer in Oregon who says he supplies them with large amounts of organic certified corn seed. I have wondered over the last few years what they are up to purchasing the seed. I think perhaps they want a back-up plan for if and when they can't sell GMOs any more. It goes to show they are not so confident. Perhaps they are just trying to ride the tide as far as they can before it crashes. Then their back up plan is probably to sell "organic" which most folks will have had to change over to trying to escape the GM food. Little do they know that I don't plan to purchase either from them. Not just because I don't trust their "organic" food. I don't plan to give them one penny to come up with new ways to try to take over our food supply. There is nothing they could do that would gain my trust.

Thursday, June 13, 2013

New Pig Research Shows GMOs Harmful

Genetically engineered food once again has been shown to harm animals. New research published June 11th (Judy A. Carman, Howard R. Vlieger, Larry J. Ver Steeg, Verlyn E. Sneller, Garth W. Robinson, Catherine A. Clinch-Jones, Julie I. Haynes, John W. Edwards (2013). A long-term toxicology study on pigs fed a combined genetically modified (GM) soy and  GM maize diet. Journal of Organic Systems 8 (1): 38-54. Open access full http://www.organic-systems.org/journal/81/8106.pdf )


This research shows severe gastrointestinal and uterine damage to pigs when fed a combination of GE foods. A review with photos can be found at this link.

Friday, November 30, 2012

Monsanto Trying to Get Immunity From Fed Law in Ag Bill

A Monsanto rider, whose official name is the “farmers assurance provision" has been slipped into the multi-billion dollar 2013 Agricultural Appropriations bill, would require - not just allow, but require - the Secretary of Agriculture to grant a temporary permit for the planting or cultivation of a genetically engineered crop, even if a federal court has ordered the planting be halted until an Environmental Impact Statement is completed. 

All the farmer or the biotech producer has to do is ask, and the questionable crops could be released into the environment where they could potentially contaminate conventional or organic crops and, ultimately, the nation's food supply.

Unless the Senate or we consumers can stop them, the House of Representatives is likely to ram this dangerous rider through any day now. This is Monsantos's response to successful lawsuits brought by the Center for Food Safety on behalf of organic and non-GMO farmers and seed growers that have attempted to block planting of genetically engineered sugar beets and alfalfa while the USDA conducted a court-ordered review of the dangers of contamination.

Tell Your Representative to Strike Sec. 733 from the Agriculture Appropriations Bill!
Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.) has sponsored an amendment to kill the rider. But even if DeFazio’s amendment makes it through the House vote, it still has to survive the Senate. Tell you representatives to support DeFazios ammendment to throw out the “farmers assurance provision"  and that  you do not want the Ag bill to pass with the biotech protective “farmers assurance provision"  in place  and to vote down the Ag bill if they have to. You can easily do this at this site. or you can  look up your representative and send them a personal note at this site.

Thursday, November 1, 2012

The Future of Food

Another movie on genetically engineered food called  "The Future of Food." You need to watch it if you have not seen it in the past.  Free to watch until November 5th. See it here! Send it to others also.

Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Update on GMO Canola in Willamette Valley

Many of us have been working hard to stop the Oregon Dept. of Agriculture (ODA) from expanding the Canola boundaries  out through most of the Willamette Valley. There are various reasons it concerns us. 

1) 94% of canola is genetically modified. 
2) It will cross pollinate and contaminate many of our mustard family crops 
3) It will become a weedy pest as it moves all through the Willamette Valley 
4) It will bring in more mustard family pests for neighboring farmers to deal with.

One particular person has made it her current full time job. She has created a website that is very useful. At her website you can find everything you need to know. Here is a letter from Kim and various links from her website. I have slightly abbreviated my friend's letter and made a few notes of my own. 

THREE LINKS

Did you know the expansion of canola can harm the farmers that grow your food crops, as well as your ability to garden and save seed?  Have you given your testimony yet? 
 
Right now, our community is faced with a serious risk to our food and seed farmers.  The Willamette Valley is one of the last five great seed-growing regions in the world and has been a protected zone since the 1990's.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture (ODA) is trying to allow canola to be grown on thousands of acres in the Willamette Valley.  This goes directly against the scientific research done by OSU, where the findings clearly demonstrated that canola would be harmful to our vegetable seed, clover seed, fresh market and organic farmers.

An unprecedented coalition of farmers is against this change. They have told the ODA of the economic harms they face, and supported expensive legal action that stopped planting of canola this fall.  However, we're not in the clear yet.  Our farmers need your help.

On Thursday, the ODA announced that they were extending the public comment period to November 2nd.   At the September public hearing, only 7 people testified pro-canola, versus 64 against. It appears the ODA is extending the time to gain more testimonies in favor of canola. (We can use it in our favor to send more testimonies against the canola expansion.)

 
Organic farmers experience a double risk from the expansion of canola acreage.  The ODA has provided no restriction on GM canola and cannot restrict it by law. (Let's change that law.) Please help us preserve organic agriculture and make sure your voice is heard.  Please forward this letter to your friends and family, and help educate them about this serious risk to Oregon farmers and agriculture.  Your farmer thanks you!

Click here for our website with a ready-made testimony form:(Choose consumer testimony, or farmer testimony, as appropriate.)

More information on how growing canola is harmful to our farmers:

Our farmers thank you for your help.

Eat well,

Kim Goodwin
Oregonians for Farm & Food Rights
www.farmandfoodrights.org

 

Thursday, October 11, 2012

Genetic Roulette Movie Available for Free Again

Jeffrey Smith is allowing a full and free viewing of his movie "Genetic Roulette" again from Oct 10-17. In the remaining critical days before the election, the vital information in this documentary is extremely important to voters in California who are facing a barrage of misdirection from the biotech industry to influence their choice on Prop 37 for labeling of GMO food. Send this link to your friends and family in California to watch. You can watch it at this link.  This preview is for one week only. So watch it now.

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Review of Recent GMO Research: Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize

I took the copy of "Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize" to bed with me last night for some late night reading. It got me so wound up that I almost got out of bed to write this. However, I pulled in the reins and waited until today. If you want to read the original research, and I suggest you do, click here for the link at the bottom of their page. (they have great photos here is why I send you here first) you can also go directly to the article HERE.

The article is from Food and Chemical Toxicology, September 19, 2012, Gilles-Eric Seralini, Emile Clair, Robin Mesnage, Steeve Gress, Nicolas Defarge, Mauela Malatesta, Didier Hennequin, Joel Spirousce Vendomois.

This is such great research for the following reasons:
• It was undertaken by individuals without conflicts of interest. 

• It was long-term. This was a life-long rat feeding study. The study was over a two year period.  Much of the GE(GMO, genetically engineered) research has been criticized for being so short term that it misses any chronic health problems that would occur from ingesting GE food. This study gives us a good idea of what happens when human beings eat GE food long-term.

• They used the actual formulation of Roundup that is used in agricultural use. Most research takes the active ingredient out and studies only the active ingredient called glyphosate. Glyphosate (active ingredient in Roundup) is only able to penetrate target plant organisms with the help of adjuvants that are included in various formulations on the market. So these researchers used the actual Roundup formulation available on the market with adjuvants so it would mimic what people actually get in their food or what has been found in tap water.

The Corn
The type of GE maize researched was MON-00603-6, also known as NK603. This is a Roundup-tolerant variety of corn owned by Monsanto. They compared it with a control group that was fed the nearest isogenic, non-transgenic corn. (So basically they compared Monsantos genetically engineered corn to a non-genetically altered corn that has similar dna structure.) Remember,  Monsanto claims their corn is theoretically genetically identical to this isogenic corn and they claim they should not have to study long term effects of their GE corn for this reason. Thank goodness, these researchers did not agree with Monsanto.

What Specifically Was Studied - How did they grow the corn to be studied?
They studied both the NK603 grown in a field by itself with no Roundup applied as well as the NK603 which had Roundup applied to it. They were careful to grow the "Normal corn", the NK603 and the NK603 with Roundup applied in similar fields and conditions. They also studied the effect of Roundup itself.

How It Was Done
There were 200 rats. 100 males and 100 females. Each were broken up in to ten different groups, each with ten rats. 

The rats were fed balanced diets that had either 11%, 22% or 33% of GE maize, cultivated either with or without Roundup or 33% of the non-transgenic control line. They also gave three groups of rats the control diet (normal maize) with the addition of Roundup in their drinking water. One of the Roundup water groups had 1.1 x 10(-8%) an amount that is a level found regularly in some tap waters (according to them). The second Roundup water group had .09% which is half of the US MRL(maximum residue limit) of glyphosate in some GE feeds and .5% which is half of the minimal agricultural working dilution.

What Body Samples Were Examined
Blood samples looking at hormones, minerals, blood sugar, indicators of various organ diseases, and inflammatory conditions. They were very thorough.  The blood samples were taken often enough to get a good picture of the animals health over the two year period. They also took urine samples at various time. At the end of the rats lives they took weights and  samples of most of their organs.  It was very thorough!

Organ retrieval: The idea was to follow these rats throughout their entire life-span and examine their organs at the end of  two years. Some animals became so sick they had to sacrifice them during the research and examine them at that time. This was done according to ethical rules. At the end of the two year study, any animals who had not died due to the research induced pathologies or due to old age were sacrificed. They then collected most of their organs  for weight, tumors and microscopy examination.

Results & Observations of Researchers 
Remember as you read this that this was a two year experiment and most lab rats live about two years. So this was an experiment following these animals through what a normal life-span would be for them.

They have a great summary table (Table 2) that you should take a look at. It gives you a quick comparison of the most frequent health effects caused by the GE corn and GE corn with Roundup and Roundup in water. The interesting thing that you notice right off is that indeed the GE corn and GE corn/Roundup and Roundup water groups always have more health problems than the controls. 

The largest palpable growths were found to be non-regressive tumors. Tumors were found to increase in size and number over the course of the experiment. The tumors were usually 2-3 times more likely in the treated groups than controls. This was in both females and males.

In females the largest tumors were in total 5 times more frequent than in males after the 2 year period. 93% of them were mammary (breast) tumors. (Hmmm, anyone thinking about the increase of breast cancer in human females?) At the end of the two years 50-80% of the treated female animals had developed tumors while only 30% of the controls were affected. The Roundup treatment groups showed the greatest rates of tumor incidence with 80% of the animals affected. These mammary tumors are generally known to be mostly estrogen-dependent.   (Roundup has been shown to disrupt aromatase which synthesizes estrogens as well as interfere with estrogen and androgen receptors in cells.)

The second most affected organ in the females was the pituitary gland. They were affected 2 times more than the controls for most treatments. (The pituitary gland is very important as it regulates many hormonal systems of the body.)

The big palpable tumors in the males (in their kidneys and skin mostly) were by the end of the two years on average seen twice as often as the controls.

 The most affected organs in the male rats were the liver, digestive tract and kidneys. Liver congestion and both visible and microscopic areas of dead tissue were 2.5-5.5 times more frequent in all the treatment groups than the control groups.

In females the androgen/estrogen balance in serum was modified by the GM maize and Roundup treatments. (Again they have a great table you should veiw.)  In the males at the highest Roundup treatment they had almost double the usual amount of estrogen. Any of you guys eating GE food that are using Cialis or some other errectile enhancer? Does this finally make you think of throwing your GE food in the trash? (Now I am thinking about all the farmers reporting poor fertility in their animals eating GE food. Plus, have you noticed the huge increase in fertility clinics. Infertility in humans is skyrocketing.)

The interesting thing to note is that the groups with smaller amounts of GE corn, GE corn/Roundup and Roundup water  caused as much damage as the groups who consumed or drank larger amounts. When you see this table, you realize people who are ingesting as much as 11% of their diet as GE food could be causing themselves as much organ damage and growing as many tumors as those  eating 33% of their diet as GE food. How scarey is that? People who think it is okay to eat a little bit of GE food better rethink that idea.

Discussion

They pointed out some things in their discussion that I thought were noteworthy. 

• As I just mentioned similar pathological effects were seen to happen from lowest to highest doses. This suggests some sort of threshold effect. More about this below.

• The first large tumors in the rats occurred around 4-7 months in both males and females (This would relate to 13-22 years of age in a human eating GE food and Roundup sprayed food since birth. So far we have not gotten this far along in our human large scale experiment. Are you still a human rat or have you thrown out your GE food?) This proves that the standard 3 month studies are ridiculous as they won't catch much.

• Roundup all by itself is hazardous, even in the smallest doses they used. (Remember they said this dose is found in some tap water? Plus the larger dose  (their medium amount) that was given to the rats corresponds to the amount of Roundup that is acceptable levels of this pesticide as a residue on GE food.  Eeeek!!!

• You might start thinking that Roundup itself is the problem and not the GE food. However, the groups fed the NK603 corn without Roundup application still had the enhanced tumor activity and increased mortality rates.

• It is interesting to note that these researchers measured caffeic and ferulic acids in the GE diets. These  were significantly reduced. They hypothesized that this may lower the protective effects against carcinogenesis and mammalian tumors. Ferulic acid may also modulate estrogen receptors or the estrogenic pathway in the cells of mammals.  They thought this might explain why the effects of NK603 and Roundup are not additive and reach a threshold level. They think that both of them may cause hormonal disturbances in the same biochemical and physiological pathway.

Another thing regarding caffeic and ferulic acid is they have been shown to promote detoxification of embryonic kidney cells after Roundup contamination in prior research by Ganier in 2011. The decreased amount of them in the GE diet could account partially or wholly for the kidney damage.

• The disturbances found in the male's livers were indicative of long term chronic intoxication. The researchers thought the females were less effected by the liver intoxication due to their being better adapted to estrogen metabolism. They also mention that liver enzymes have been demonstrated to be sex-specific in their expression patterns. Deeper analysis at an ultrastructural level did show defects in cell nuclear structure that were similar in both sexes.

• They also point out that prior research had already shown glyphosate consumption in water above authorized limits can provoke liver and kidney failure. This study simply proves that lower levels of glyphosate (Roundup), below those set as safety limits can cause severe hormone-dependent breast, kidney and liver disturbances. In addition, GM NK603 maize can cause similar pathologies that may be linked to abnormal or unbalanced phenolic acids, metabolites, or related compounds. However, they do not exclude the possibility of other mutagenic or metabolic effects. (Okay, if you have not ran to your pantry and thrown out your GE food yet, what are you waiting for?)

• This makes me really glad that I and my animals eat organic food. Hope any of you reading this who are currently eating conventional food, will go throw out all your products with corn, soy, cotton seed oil, and canola oil from your pantry immediately and consider eating only organic in the future.

I take my hat off to the researchers Gilles Eric Seralini, Emile Calir, Robin Mesnage, Steeve Gress, Nicolas Defarge, Manuela Malatesta, Didier Hnnequin, Joel Spiroux de Vendomois. The planet is indebted to you and those like you who are spending countless hours working for the better of planetary life. You and others like you are in my prayers. You are going to need all the support you can get as you just took on a monster. Let us all support you in any way we can.


Thursday, August 23, 2012

Boycott These Organic Companies

Some large companies are selling you organic food while at the same time they are funding opposition to California's proposition 37 which is the GMO labeling initiative.  Do you want to support companies that would keep you from knowing if you are eating GMO's or not? Please join us in a massive boycott against these companies. They include Kellogg's (Kashi, Bear Naked, Morningstar Farms); General Mills (Muir Glen, Cascadian Farm, Larabar); Dean Foods (Horizon, Silk, White Wave); Smucker's (R.W. Knudsen, Santa Cruz Organic); Coca-Cola (Honest Tea, Odwalla); Safeway ("O" Organics); Kraft (Boca Burgers and Back to Nature); Con-Agra (Orville Redenbacher's Organic, Hunt's Organic, Lightlife); and PepsiCo (Naked Juice, Tostito's Organic, Tropicana Organic), Mars (Seeds of Change).

California's Prop 37 will require labels on genetically engineered foods, and will also ban the fraudulent (and highly profitable) industry practice of marketing GMO-tainted foods as "natural."  
The  Biotech and Big Food corporations have dumped $25 million dollars into defeating Prop 37. The "Yes on 37" campaign has raised only $3 million so far, in part because most of the wealthy organic elite (Whole Foods Market, Trader Joe's, Stonyfield, etc.) are still sitting on the sidelines. Tell these companies they need to chip in NOW!

Please see my prior blog explaining how if the Nov. 6th GMO right-to-know ballot initiative (Prop 37), currently supported by the overwhelming majority of voters, passes in California - the eighth largest economy in the world - it will have the same impact across the United States as a national law.

To see the details on how much money these companies have contributed as well as additional information on the companies go to the "Friends & Enemies of Your Right to Know"

Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Genetically Engineered Canola Comes to Oregon August 15th

GMO Canola is coming to the Willamette valley on August 15 unless we stop it.

Canola is in the brassica family and readily crosses with turnips, broccoli raab, some kales, rutabaga, and possibly radish and broccoli. All of these seed crops and more have been grown by specialty seed farmers here in the valley for over 30 years. GMO canola would become a roadside weed, protected from the county's roadside maintenance by its "Roundup Ready" glyphosate herbicide resistance. It would contaminate professional seed growers and garden seed savers alike. 

Canola would contaminate Oregon's vegetable and flower seed production industry that is worth $32 million to $50 million annually.

In the past, specialty seed growers have maintained a pinning map that organizes and isolates seed farms to minimize contamination between crops and varieties. GMO canola growers would ignore these pinning rules. Trucks hauling seed for transport the processing plant would spill seed on highway margins.

OSU scientists agree that contamination of seed crops is inevitable. Once a GMO species is introduced to an area, its proliferation is rampant. So, between GMO canola and the specialty vegetable seed industry, there can be no coexistence.

Normally for these types of major agricultural changes, there is a 30-day public comment period. However, with pressure from the corporate lobby Sequential fuels, the Oregon Department of Agriculture is expediting the process. So, if you wish to be heard, contact ODA director Katy Coba to voice your opinion.

August 15 is the planting date for GMO canola.


Learn more about this story here.

Sequential fuels website: 

What can you do?
 Write to the Oregon Dept of Agriculture and Sequential Fuels!

1. Tell Sequential Fuels you do not want GE canola in Oregon and will discontinue buying their fuel if GE canola comes into our state. (They are the ones who lobbied to get it here.)
http://www.sqbiofuels.com/contact
Salem Office 503.585.1673

Sequential Retail/ Eugene Station
86714 McVay Hwy
Eugene, Oregon 97405
Phone: 541.736.5864

2. Please write to the director of the Oregon Department of Agriculture who made the decision to bring GE Canola into the state:  Katy Coba at kcoba@oda.state.or.us and tell her you do not want GE Canola in Oregon. You can also call her at 503-986-4552


Here is a sample letter that I sent to her. 

Hello Katy Coba,

I am commenting during your 30 day public comment period on the introduction of genetically engineered (GE) canola into Oregon. Please note this is a formal and legal comment.

I am a farmer and native Oregonian. Just like you, I come from Eastern Oregon. I am concerned about your decision to introduce genetically engineered canola into Oregon. In my opinion it is not being thought out carefully and your actions are too hasty.

Canola is in the brassica family and readily crosses with turnips, broccoli raab, some kales, rutabaga, and possibly radish and broccoli. All of these seed crops and more have been grown by specialty seed farmers here in the valley for over 30 years. GE canola would become a roadside weed. It would contaminate professional seed growers and garden seed savers alike. This mistake could become a financial problem for many farmers/gardeners who will blame you and your office ultimately.

In the past, specialty seed growers have maintained a pinning map that organizes and isolates seed farms to minimize contamination between crops and varieties. GMO canola growers would ignore these pinning rules. Trucks hauling seed for transport the processing plant would spill seed on highway margins.

OSU scientists agree that contamination of seed crops is inevitable. Once a GMO species is introduced to an area, its proliferation is rampant.

I and many other Oregonians will take it very personally if those of us who raise and sell seeds or simply grow our own seeds find them contaminated by GE Canola you allowed into Oregon.  I want to make it very clear that I do not want GE Canola grown in Oregon.  Please let me know what steps you plan to take to make sure GE Canola will not contaminate my or other farmers/gardeners crops/gardens.

I look forward to hearing back from you.

Sharol Tilgner

Friday, July 13, 2012

How Your Senator Voted on GMO Labeling

Below is a list of the various senators and how they voted June 21st, 2012 on the Agricultural Reform Act amendment to label genetically engineered food. Check to see how yours voted. Note you can look them up by their name of by state.  If they voted yes, let them know you appreciate it. If they voted no, tell them you want them to support labeling of GMO food next time. Once you have found how your senator voted, just click here to contact your senator. 

 
    XML U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 112th Congress - 2nd Session
as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate
Vote Summary
Question: On the Amendment (Sanders Amdt. No. 2310 )
Vote Number: 161 Vote Date: June 21, 2012, 12:36 PM
Required For Majority: 3/5 Vote Result: Amendment Rejected
Amendment Number: S.Amdt. 2310 to S. 3240 (Agriculture Reform, Food, and Jobs Act of 2012)
Statement of Purpose: To permit States to require that any food, beverage, or other edible product offered for sale have a label on indicating that the food, beverage, or other edible product contains a genetically engineered ingredient.
Vote Counts:YEAs26

NAYs73

Not Voting1
Vote SummaryBy Senator NameBy Vote PositionBy Home State
Alphabetical by Senator Name
Akaka (D-HI), Yea
Alexander (R-TN), Nay
Ayotte (R-NH), Nay
Barrasso (R-WY), Nay
Baucus (D-MT), Nay
Begich (D-AK), Yea
Bennet (D-CO), Yea
Bingaman (D-NM), Nay
Blumenthal (D-CT), Yea
Blunt (R-MO), Nay
Boozman (R-AR), Nay
Boxer (D-CA), Yea
Brown (D-OH), Nay
Brown (R-MA), Nay
Burr (R-NC), Nay
Cantwell (D-WA), Yea
Cardin (D-MD), Yea
Carper (D-DE), Nay
Casey (D-PA), Nay
Chambliss (R-GA), Nay
Coats (R-IN), Nay
Coburn (R-OK), Nay
Cochran (R-MS), Nay
Collins (R-ME), Nay
Conrad (D-ND), Nay
Coons (D-DE), Nay
Corker (R-TN), Nay
Cornyn (R-TX), Nay
Crapo (R-ID), Nay
DeMint (R-SC), Nay
Durbin (D-IL), Nay
Enzi (R-WY), Nay
Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
Franken (D-MN), Nay
Gillibrand (D-NY), Nay
Graham (R-SC), Nay
Grassley (R-IA), Nay
Hagan (D-NC), Nay
Harkin (D-IA), Nay
Hatch (R-UT), Nay
Heller (R-NV), Nay
Hoeven (R-ND), Nay
Hutchison (R-TX), Nay
Inhofe (R-OK), Nay
Inouye (D-HI), Yea
Isakson (R-GA), Nay
Johanns (R-NE), Nay
Johnson (D-SD), Yea
Johnson (R-WI), Nay
Kerry (D-MA), Yea
Kirk (R-IL), Not Voting
Klobuchar (D-MN), Nay
Kohl (D-WI), Nay
Kyl (R-AZ), Nay
Landrieu (D-LA), Nay
Lautenberg (D-NJ), Yea
Leahy (D-VT), Yea
Lee (R-UT), Nay
Levin (D-MI), Nay
Lieberman (ID-CT), Yea
Lugar (R-IN), Nay
Manchin (D-WV), Yea
McCain (R-AZ), Nay
McCaskill (D-MO), Nay
McConnell (R-KY), Nay
Menendez (D-NJ), Nay
Merkley (D-OR), Yea
Mikulski (D-MD), Yea
Moran (R-KS), Nay
Murkowski (R-AK), Yea
Murray (D-WA), Yea
Nelson (D-FL), Nay
Nelson (D-NE), Nay
Paul (R-KY), Nay
Portman (R-OH), Nay
Pryor (D-AR), Nay
Reed (D-RI), Yea
Reid (D-NV), Nay
Risch (R-ID), Nay
Roberts (R-KS), Nay
Rockefeller (D-WV), Yea
Rubio (R-FL), Nay
Sanders (I-VT), Yea
Schumer (D-NY), Nay
Sessions (R-AL), Nay
Shaheen (D-NH), Nay
Shelby (R-AL), Nay
Snowe (R-ME), Nay
Stabenow (D-MI), Nay
Tester (D-MT), Yea
Thune (R-SD), Nay
Toomey (R-PA), Nay
Udall (D-CO), Nay
Udall (D-NM), Yea
Vitter (R-LA), Nay
Warner (D-VA), Nay
Webb (D-VA), Nay
Whitehouse (D-RI), Yea
Wicker (R-MS), Nay
Wyden (D-OR), Yea
Vote SummaryBy Senator NameBy Vote PositionBy Home State
Grouped By Vote Position
YEAs ---26
Akaka (D-HI)
Begich (D-AK)
Bennet (D-CO)
Blumenthal (D-CT)
Boxer (D-CA)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Inouye (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kerry (D-MA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Lieberman (ID-CT)
Manchin (D-WV)
Merkley (D-OR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Murray (D-WA)
Reed (D-RI)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sanders (I-VT)
Tester (D-MT)
Udall (D-NM)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)
NAYs ---73
Alexander (R-TN)
Ayotte (R-NH)
Barrasso (R-WY)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Blunt (R-MO)
Boozman (R-AR)
Brown (D-OH)
Brown (R-MA)
Burr (R-NC)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coats (R-IN)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Collins (R-ME)
Conrad (D-ND)
Coons (D-DE)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
Durbin (D-IL)
Enzi (R-WY)
Franken (D-MN)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Hagan (D-NC)
Harkin (D-IA)
Hatch (R-UT)
Heller (R-NV)
Hoeven (R-ND)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johanns (R-NE)
Johnson (R-WI)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Kohl (D-WI)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lee (R-UT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lugar (R-IN)
McCain (R-AZ)
McCaskill (D-MO)
McConnell (R-KY)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Moran (R-KS)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Paul (R-KY)
Portman (R-OH)
Pryor (D-AR)
Reid (D-NV)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Rubio (R-FL)
Schumer (D-NY)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Shelby (R-AL)
Snowe (R-ME)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Thune (R-SD)
Toomey (R-PA)
Udall (D-CO)
Vitter (R-LA)
Warner (D-VA)
Webb (D-VA)
Wicker (R-MS)
Not Voting - 1
Kirk (R-IL)
Vote SummaryBy Senator NameBy Vote PositionBy Home State
Grouped by Home State
Alabama:Sessions (R-AL), NayShelby (R-AL), Nay
Alaska:Begich (D-AK), YeaMurkowski (R-AK), Yea
Arizona:Kyl (R-AZ), NayMcCain (R-AZ), Nay
Arkansas:Boozman (R-AR), NayPryor (D-AR), Nay
California:Boxer (D-CA), YeaFeinstein (D-CA), Yea
Colorado:Bennet (D-CO), YeaUdall (D-CO), Nay
Connecticut:Blumenthal (D-CT), YeaLieberman (ID-CT), Yea
Delaware:Carper (D-DE), NayCoons (D-DE), Nay
Florida:Nelson (D-FL), NayRubio (R-FL), Nay
Georgia:Chambliss (R-GA), NayIsakson (R-GA), Nay
Hawaii:Akaka (D-HI), YeaInouye (D-HI), Yea
Idaho:Crapo (R-ID), NayRisch (R-ID), Nay
Illinois:Durbin (D-IL), NayKirk (R-IL), Not Voting
Indiana:Coats (R-IN), NayLugar (R-IN), Nay
Iowa:Grassley (R-IA), NayHarkin (D-IA), Nay
Kansas:Moran (R-KS), NayRoberts (R-KS), Nay
Kentucky:McConnell (R-KY), NayPaul (R-KY), Nay
Louisiana:Landrieu (D-LA), NayVitter (R-LA), Nay
Maine:Collins (R-ME), NaySnowe (R-ME), Nay
Maryland:Cardin (D-MD), YeaMikulski (D-MD), Yea
Massachusetts:Brown (R-MA), NayKerry (D-MA), Yea
Michigan:Levin (D-MI), NayStabenow (D-MI), Nay
Minnesota:Franken (D-MN), NayKlobuchar (D-MN), Nay
Mississippi:Cochran (R-MS), NayWicker (R-MS), Nay
Missouri:Blunt (R-MO), NayMcCaskill (D-MO), Nay
Montana:Baucus (D-MT), NayTester (D-MT), Yea
Nebraska:Johanns (R-NE), NayNelson (D-NE), Nay
Nevada:Heller (R-NV), NayReid (D-NV), Nay
New Hampshire:Ayotte (R-NH), NayShaheen (D-NH), Nay
New Jersey:Lautenberg (D-NJ), YeaMenendez (D-NJ), Nay
New Mexico:Bingaman (D-NM), NayUdall (D-NM), Yea
New York:Gillibrand (D-NY), NaySchumer (D-NY), Nay
North Carolina:Burr (R-NC), NayHagan (D-NC), Nay
North Dakota:Conrad (D-ND), NayHoeven (R-ND), Nay
Ohio:Brown (D-OH), NayPortman (R-OH), Nay
Oklahoma:Coburn (R-OK), NayInhofe (R-OK), Nay
Oregon:Merkley (D-OR), YeaWyden (D-OR), Yea
Pennsylvania:Casey (D-PA), NayToomey (R-PA), Nay
Rhode Island:Reed (D-RI), YeaWhitehouse (D-RI), Yea
South Carolina:DeMint (R-SC), NayGraham (R-SC), Nay
South Dakota:Johnson (D-SD), YeaThune (R-SD), Nay
Tennessee:Alexander (R-TN), NayCorker (R-TN), Nay
Texas:Cornyn (R-TX), NayHutchison (R-TX), Nay
Utah:Hatch (R-UT), NayLee (R-UT), Nay
Vermont:Leahy (D-VT), YeaSanders (I-VT), Yea
Virginia:Warner (D-VA), NayWebb (D-VA), Nay
Washington:Cantwell (D-WA), YeaMurray (D-WA), Yea
West Virginia:Manchin (D-WV), YeaRockefeller (D-WV), Yea
Wisconsin:Johnson (R-WI), NayKohl (D-WI), Nay
Wyoming:Barrasso (R-WY), NayEnzi (R-WY), Nay